Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Quiara Vasquez's avatar

This was a GREAT movie to see on the fourth of July in a packed theater. Obviously inferior to the original, but what isn't?? Definitely some grumblings in the audience about the cowardice of not actually killing off [REDACTED] in the third act, though. Also Jonathan Bailey has the best agent in Hollywood for getting me to say, "wow, he's so great as the male lead in this reheated Spielberg franchise, playing a hunky archaeologist named Henry" lmaooo. Hollywood can't mint A-listers like they used to but if anyone's gonna get up there...

Koepp is having a great year btw -- wrote both of the Soderbergh films that were in theaters in the spring, both of which seemed to be critical hits. (Not quite with me -- I thought "Black Bag" was oozing sex, which is nice for a change, but it definitely felt like a film coasting on the joy of watching pretty people wear nice suits and use cool gadgets rather than the heady spy thriller I was promised. The less said about "Presence" the better.)

Expand full comment
Will Marshall's avatar

I really appreciated you including the detail of John Mathieson's decision to use 35mm film. All through my watch, I had an inexplicable feeling that the aesthetic 'look' of this film was far closer to Spielberg's original than any of the other 'World' movies and I think that shooting decision explains a lot of it. There's certainly more grit to this one too and the central characters look far more like survivalists than the corporate characters of the previous film which makes that aesthetic decision make complete sense.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts